Austrian pandours, circa 1742. These might provide an interesting painting reference for 15 or so Minden figures that have been lurking in the leadpile unpainted, as yet, for a number of years now.
Soliciting input this Sunday morning from any visitors to the GD of S who care to comment. In the ongoing tinkering with my moral rules, I am still not quite certain where to put the aforementioned troops on the A-E continuum. I know that such troops could be very deadly and cutthroat in the right circumstances, yet run away all too easily in others. Somehow making them D or E class doesn't seem quite the thing though, so I need some more informed guidance. What are your views and the reasoning behind them? Thank you in advance
-- Stokes
Comments
As long as they are fighting in cover I'd think that their morale would be fairly good. Maybe they should not be any different from other light troops in your armies or rules. The Croats were very tough defenders of Krchorz during the battle of Kolin and they performed very well fighting the Prussians on the Lobosch Hill at Lobositz.
They didnt so much run away as retire from formed troops a bit like your native indians. They were clearly very effective in the 'little wars' but couldnt stand against formed infantry with bayonets. Putting them in a class is difficult. Of course you could complicate it by making then a higher class for shooting but a lower class for standing and fighting. The idea was to hit and run or hide and shoot.Unfortunately when the Austrians made them into regular light infantry they became very ineffective. Clearly they were veruy good irregulars.
Best wishes,
Jeremy
Just a thought.
Best Iain