Skip to main content

A Morale Class Question: Where to Put Croats, Pandours, and Freibattalions???

Austrian pandours, circa 1742.  These might provide an interesting painting reference for 15 or so Minden figures that have been lurking in the leadpile unpainted, as yet, for a number of years now.


Soliciting input this Sunday morning from any visitors to the GD of S who care to comment.  In the ongoing tinkering with my moral rules, I am still not quite certain where to put the aforementioned troops on the A-E continuum.  I know that such troops could be very deadly and cutthroat in the right circumstances, yet run away all too easily in others.  Somehow making them D or E class doesn't seem quite the thing though, so I need some more informed guidance.  What are your views and the reasoning behind them?  Thank you in advance

-- Stokes

Comments

Der Alte Fritz said…
This is a good question, Stokes. I don't believe that the morale of the Croat troops is lacking, but rather they are not keen on getting into close quarters combat with regular troops. Their style of combat reminds me of that of Eastern Woodlands Indians in North America during the 1700s. They will fight, ambush, raid and plunder but are loath to take casualties

As long as they are fighting in cover I'd think that their morale would be fairly good. Maybe they should not be any different from other light troops in your armies or rules. The Croats were very tough defenders of Krchorz during the battle of Kolin and they performed very well fighting the Prussians on the Lobosch Hill at Lobositz.
Stokes,
They didnt so much run away as retire from formed troops a bit like your native indians. They were clearly very effective in the 'little wars' but couldnt stand against formed infantry with bayonets. Putting them in a class is difficult. Of course you could complicate it by making then a higher class for shooting but a lower class for standing and fighting. The idea was to hit and run or hide and shoot.Unfortunately when the Austrians made them into regular light infantry they became very ineffective. Clearly they were veruy good irregulars.
Peter Douglas said…
It’s an age old question, mostly because morale carried from regiment to regiment especially with the fire corps.i could argue b-d depend8ng on the unit and the day.
StuartInsch said…
I'd go with randomisation too, that way even you don't know how they will perform, until their first test. I'd keep them on the lower half of the table C-E since you shouldn't be sending them charging into melee or getting them caught in one unless you have too.
warpaintjj said…
I might suggest a random element but positively weighted in rough ground or against other light troops and negatively so if facing formed troops in the open. We face a similar conundrum with Grenzers...
Best wishes,
Jeremy
Unknown said…
Could you try a “likely to run/fragile” classification with a saving roll to cancel it?
Just a thought.
caveadsum1471 said…
I recently read an aar where these kind of troops got a random morale rating at the beginning of the game which seemed to work well, you could customize it further by say giving the roll a +1 in broken country or woods and-1 for open fields perhaps?
Best Iain

Popular posts from this blog

The 18th century? What's the Fascination?

Hessian musketeers by All the King's Men Toy Soldiers of Snellville, Georgia, U.S.A. Just a quick post post today, but I thought the above question might be interesting food for thought. Obviously, there is an array of possible periods, theaters, and conflicts that might catch our eyes. But what is it about the era 1700-1799 -- either real, or imagined? Is it the commanders and politics? The fairly straightforward tactics? The myriad of uniforms and flags? The variety and scope of the conflicts? The patchwork of various and sundry petty states, (at least in Central Europe)? I'm very interested to learn your thoughts. Don't be a lurker! Please leave a comment -- or even two or three. Have a nice day everyone!

An Early July Hussar Update. . .

  Marginally neater in appearance with green bases, girths, and ivory horse markings added, but I need to neaten up some hooves now before moving onto the rest of the tack. W here in the world did June go? While I still ponder the answer to that question, how about a quick painting update on the first batch of 14 Minden Austrian hussars and Nadasdy? Good.  I'm glad we are of a like mind. Still on the sloppy side, but I've managed to move things along, painting the green bases, white (ivory) horse markings, and beginning the miles and miles of tack adorning the various horses.  I always like to begin with the girths spanning the horses' ribs which helped hold the saddles in place.  Even with the figures mounted individually on temporary painting bases, these can be kind of tricky to access, but there we are. I've also used various Army Painter washes (Mid-Brown and Strong Tone) as well as their Speed Paint (Grim Black) to make the manes and tails of the horses a bit m...

Basic Reds Done at Last. . .

  S till quite a way to go with the current batch of 20 human figures and a horse (of course), but they're actually starting to look like something after all of the red distinctions.  Quite a bit of painting in hour-long sessions the last week as and when time has allowed.  Mostly applying the basic dark red to facing areas and turnbacks followed by the inevitable touch-ups to clean up wobbly edges and those misplaced, minute splotches of Citadel Khorne Red.   They're looking like so many Austrian infantry regiments of the era at this point, but the eventual flags will turn them magically into the Anhalt-Zerbst Regiment, more or less, of the AWI period.  But I'm getting a bit ahead of myself. One frustrating point (ahem) of sad discovery.  I've started trying to use those Winsor & Newton 'Series Seven' brushes (#1 rounds) purchased last spring, and the blasted things simply will not keep a point.  Very frustrating since I have heard over the y...