T his weekend, the question of what, precisely, constitutes an "imagination" came up in an online forum of which I am a part. To be fair, the issue originates from further afield in a Facebook group that I am not a member of, but I weighed in with my own view. The following was in response to the question posed yesterday (Sunday) morning by an exasperated member of my own rather more gentlemanly town square, who had been met with a strident response to information he shared about his (admirable) hobby activities on said FB group. Here is, more or less, what I wrote: To my mind, the concept of imagi-nation(s) is a broad one. It can range from historical refights or what-if scenarios/battles/campaigns between armies of a particular era, to completely made up combatants operating in a quasi-historical setting, to the rather generic red and blue forces of the Prussian Kriegspiel that examine a particular tactical problem, task, or exercise. ...
Comments
it stands upon my shelf next to the Duffy volumes! It is excellent and I am not surprised that you are becoming an avid fan of the work.
Enjoy!
Alan
I believe he considered it his best work.
I have a copy, but strangely enough I have not yet read it.
Your review moves it up a considerable way on my "to read" stack. Thank you.
-- Jeff
I did wonder if you missed that as you did not reply in that thread.
David.
Yes, you are indeed correct! Several of you did mentione thee Chandler titles to me. Thanks to you and others who suggested them. I've been so impressed with the first that I'll likely track down to send and try to purchase teh second as well. Please excuse my oversight! My only excuse is poor memory in this case. Mia Culpa, and thank you again.
Best Regards,
Stokes
Stokes
I'm glad you like the Chandler books!
(Oh and my typing is also often dreadful, so you are not alone; as in this sentence, I find myself retyping the d*****d thing several times!)
All the best,
David.