Skip to main content

Featherstone's Words on Shaken and Disordered Units (1988). . .

 

A Featherstonian battle in progress from decades past.  Photograph "borrowed" from the Man of Tin blog.

Rules of Wargames in the American Civil War Period (pp. 34-35 of Feathertone’s Complete Wargaming, 1988)

“The effects of being fired upon or taking part in a hand-to-hand melee are reflected by the morale of the unit as a whole being affected in that it is – Unaffected, when it remains where it is on the field, able to move, fire, or fight in the next game move in the normal style.

Shaken – when the unit withdraws its normal move distance, still in good fighting order, but not able to move forward (or towards the enemy) until the next game move.  It may fight in the normal way if attacked.

Disordered – when the unit withdraws its normal move distance, but ends with its back to the enemy, unable to fight or fire until its owner  is able to score a 4 or over on the dice, which he may throw at the beginning of each subsequent game-move.  Each failure to make the 4 means the unit retreats a further game move distance.  Whilst disordered, a unit can be fired upon or attacked without being  able to retaliate and automatically moves back – in disorder – its move distance.

Units do not suffer individual casualties and no figures are removed from the table.  This means that the actual strength of the tabletop unit is unimportant – it may consist of 20, 30, or more figures without practically affected  in any way, neither advantageously, or detrimentally.”

-- Stokes 

 

Comments

Phil Dutré said…
Always nice to see clippings like this. My own house rules also have abolished individual figure removal, and look at the unit as a whole. Much more pleasant gaming experience.
Mike Hall said…
That picture looked familiar, if a little low definition.

A quick check of my bookshelves proved this to be correct: plate 10 in Featherstone's "War Games" (December 1965 reprinted edition). The climax of the excellent little "Action in the Platteville Valley", with the Federal forces triumphing as night falls at end of move 8. I can't quote the morale rules though as none are given - though the account of the action shows that they exist and are a little more primitive than the 1988 version. No "disorder", units just become "shaken" and, unless rallied at some point, eventually retreating off the table edge. This makes a nice "old school" refight (I just borrow the Ancient Warfare morale rules from earlier in the book).

I think that the picture credit should probably be "Don Featherstone by way of Man of Tin blog" though it is possible that both of you need a higher quality scan.

Popular posts from this blog

The 18th century? What's the Fascination?

Hessian musketeers by All the King's Men Toy Soldiers of Snellville, Georgia, U.S.A. Just a quick post post today, but I thought the above question might be interesting food for thought. Obviously, there is an array of possible periods, theaters, and conflicts that might catch our eyes. But what is it about the era 1700-1799 -- either real, or imagined? Is it the commanders and politics? The fairly straightforward tactics? The myriad of uniforms and flags? The variety and scope of the conflicts? The patchwork of various and sundry petty states, (at least in Central Europe)? I'm very interested to learn your thoughts. Don't be a lurker! Please leave a comment -- or even two or three. Have a nice day everyone!

An Early July Hussar Update. . .

  Marginally neater in appearance with green bases, girths, and ivory horse markings added, but I need to neaten up some hooves now before moving onto the rest of the tack. W here in the world did June go? While I still ponder the answer to that question, how about a quick painting update on the first batch of 14 Minden Austrian hussars and Nadasdy? Good.  I'm glad we are of a like mind. Still on the sloppy side, but I've managed to move things along, painting the green bases, white (ivory) horse markings, and beginning the miles and miles of tack adorning the various horses.  I always like to begin with the girths spanning the horses' ribs which helped hold the saddles in place.  Even with the figures mounted individually on temporary painting bases, these can be kind of tricky to access, but there we are. I've also used various Army Painter washes (Mid-Brown and Strong Tone) as well as their Speed Paint (Grim Black) to make the manes and tails of the horses a bit m...

Basic Reds Done at Last. . .

  S till quite a way to go with the current batch of 20 human figures and a horse (of course), but they're actually starting to look like something after all of the red distinctions.  Quite a bit of painting in hour-long sessions the last week as and when time has allowed.  Mostly applying the basic dark red to facing areas and turnbacks followed by the inevitable touch-ups to clean up wobbly edges and those misplaced, minute splotches of Citadel Khorne Red.   They're looking like so many Austrian infantry regiments of the era at this point, but the eventual flags will turn them magically into the Anhalt-Zerbst Regiment, more or less, of the AWI period.  But I'm getting a bit ahead of myself. One frustrating point (ahem) of sad discovery.  I've started trying to use those Winsor & Newton 'Series Seven' brushes (#1 rounds) purchased last spring, and the blasted things simply will not keep a point.  Very frustrating since I have heard over the y...