Skip to main content

Featherstone's Words on Shaken and Disordered Units (1988). . .

 

A Featherstonian battle in progress from decades past.  Photograph "borrowed" from the Man of Tin blog.

Rules of Wargames in the American Civil War Period (pp. 34-35 of Feathertone’s Complete Wargaming, 1988)

“The effects of being fired upon or taking part in a hand-to-hand melee are reflected by the morale of the unit as a whole being affected in that it is – Unaffected, when it remains where it is on the field, able to move, fire, or fight in the next game move in the normal style.

Shaken – when the unit withdraws its normal move distance, still in good fighting order, but not able to move forward (or towards the enemy) until the next game move.  It may fight in the normal way if attacked.

Disordered – when the unit withdraws its normal move distance, but ends with its back to the enemy, unable to fight or fire until its owner  is able to score a 4 or over on the dice, which he may throw at the beginning of each subsequent game-move.  Each failure to make the 4 means the unit retreats a further game move distance.  Whilst disordered, a unit can be fired upon or attacked without being  able to retaliate and automatically moves back – in disorder – its move distance.

Units do not suffer individual casualties and no figures are removed from the table.  This means that the actual strength of the tabletop unit is unimportant – it may consist of 20, 30, or more figures without practically affected  in any way, neither advantageously, or detrimentally.”

-- Stokes 

 

Comments

Phil Dutré said…
Always nice to see clippings like this. My own house rules also have abolished individual figure removal, and look at the unit as a whole. Much more pleasant gaming experience.
Mike Hall said…
That picture looked familiar, if a little low definition.

A quick check of my bookshelves proved this to be correct: plate 10 in Featherstone's "War Games" (December 1965 reprinted edition). The climax of the excellent little "Action in the Platteville Valley", with the Federal forces triumphing as night falls at end of move 8. I can't quote the morale rules though as none are given - though the account of the action shows that they exist and are a little more primitive than the 1988 version. No "disorder", units just become "shaken" and, unless rallied at some point, eventually retreating off the table edge. This makes a nice "old school" refight (I just borrow the Ancient Warfare morale rules from earlier in the book).

I think that the picture credit should probably be "Don Featherstone by way of Man of Tin blog" though it is possible that both of you need a higher quality scan.

Popular posts from this blog

Presenting the Anspach-Bayreuth Kuirassiere!!!

Here they are, with the rearmost nine figures still drying, three squadrons of the Anspach-Bayreuth Kuirassiere, now in the service of the Grand Duchy of Stollen. And now, it's onto that artillery!

And It's the End of September!!!

  Saxony's Ploetz Cuirassiers, an illustration lifted from the Kronoskaf website, which has thus far guided my spectacularly glacial painting of 30 28mm Eureka Saxon cuirassiers purchased all the way back in October 2016. A gray, cool Saturday here in Mid-Michigan with rain in the forecast. The Grand Duchess is away at a conference, so it's just "The Boys" here at home. The Young Master (almost 15) has retreated to his room for something or other following breakfast while I have stolen back down here to Zum Stollenkeller (masquerading as my office) with a second mug of coffee and both cats comfortably ensconced nearby. Enjoying the late morning and still in my pajamas! Not much planned for today beyond designing a couple of promotional flyers for workshops my department is presenting (small parties we will throw?) in October and November.  With maybe a bit of on the next podcast script. More important,  I am toying with the idea of returning for an hour or...

Happy September 2nd!!!

    T his weekend, the question of what, precisely, constitutes an "imagination" came up in an online forum of which I am a part.  To be fair, the issue originates from further afield in a Facebook group that I am not a member of, but I weighed in with my own view.  The following was in response to the question posed yesterday (Sunday) morning by an exasperated member of my own rather more gentlemanly town square, who had been met with a strident response to information he shared about his (admirable) hobby activities on said FB group.  Here is, more or less, what I wrote: To my mind, the concept of imagi-nation(s) is a broad one.  It can range from historical refights or what-if scenarios/battles/campaigns between armies of a particular era, to completely made up combatants operating in a quasi-historical setting, to the rather generic red and blue forces of the Prussian Kriegspiel that examine a particular tactical problem, task, or exercise.   ...