Skip to main content

A Tangled Mass: Pared Down Close Combat Rules. . .


Another rousing engraving by Adolph Menzel, showing a clash between cavalry and Infantry at The Battle of Leignitz

 1) Declare charges at the start of a turn.  Move the charging unit half of its charge move toward the enemy target.  

2) Place a purple Bingo chip behind charging units, as a reminder, before attending to other matters on the table during the turn.  

3) Once events elsewhere have been seen to, check to see if charging  units actually close with intended targets for close combat.  Both players roll a D6 and move their units according to the following situations:

 

a. Charging Infantry versus Infantry in the Open

Close combat occurs if both players manage to roll the same number on their respective D6s.  If not, the unit(s) facing the oncoming bayonet charge 'retire at the double' (Retreat!) directly to the rear while the charging infantry occupy and hold the vacated space if possible.  Lower quality troops (D. or E. class) facing an oncoming charge might rout.


b. Charging Cavalry versus Counter-charging Cavalry 

Close combat occurs if both players roll the same number.  If not, the respective cavalry units pass through each other, turn about, and return to their own lines to reform.  Lower quality troops (D. or E. class) facing an oncoming charge might rout.


c. Charging Cavalry versus Infantry in the Open

If the cavalry rolls high, it closes with the fleeing infantry, gets in among them, and carnage ensues.  If the infantry rolls high, it holds steady and unleashes a volley into the oncoming cavalry.  Lower quality troops (D. or E. class) facing an oncoming charge might rout.

 

d. Artillery Crew and Light Infantry

Regardless of morale class, these troops evade approaching charges, which is to say they run for the hills. 

 

4) If close combat occurs based on above procedures, move charging units into contact with enemy targets.

5) Assess hits, saving throws, actual casualties, check morale, and carry out any compulsory moves for units that actually close with one another and/or charging cavalry receiving fire from steady infantry (see 3c. above). 

 

There is a bit more coming for close combat when it comes to determining casualties, but I think the above might clarify things reasonably well.  

But now, it is time this Sunday afternoon to take care of some preparation for the coming semester, which kicks off on September 1st.  Sigh.

On the bright side, those first 32 Schaumburg-Lippe infantry are finished except for glossing, so I plan to apply gray basecoat to the next batch of 16 bare metal castings this evening after The Young Master's bedtime. 

-- Stokes

 


Comments

arthur1815 said…
I like the simplicity of your method for determining whether troops stand to engage in close combat or break before a bayonet/cavalry charge very much (and may well steal it for use in my own rules!).

Thank you, Arthur! It's odd how difficult it is to keep things simple, but we're trying.

Best Regards,

Stokes
Rob said…
This is sort of close to what I suggested on an earlier post, obviously you'd got there before me - but I do think caargers stopping short should be more likely.

Popular posts from this blog

The 18th century? What's the Fascination?

Hessian musketeers by All the King's Men Toy Soldiers of Snellville, Georgia, U.S.A. Just a quick post post today, but I thought the above question might be interesting food for thought. Obviously, there is an array of possible periods, theaters, and conflicts that might catch our eyes. But what is it about the era 1700-1799 -- either real, or imagined? Is it the commanders and politics? The fairly straightforward tactics? The myriad of uniforms and flags? The variety and scope of the conflicts? The patchwork of various and sundry petty states, (at least in Central Europe)? I'm very interested to learn your thoughts. Don't be a lurker! Please leave a comment -- or even two or three. Have a nice day everyone!

An Early July Hussar Update. . .

  Marginally neater in appearance with green bases, girths, and ivory horse markings added, but I need to neaten up some hooves now before moving onto the rest of the tack. W here in the world did June go? While I still ponder the answer to that question, how about a quick painting update on the first batch of 14 Minden Austrian hussars and Nadasdy? Good.  I'm glad we are of a like mind. Still on the sloppy side, but I've managed to move things along, painting the green bases, white (ivory) horse markings, and beginning the miles and miles of tack adorning the various horses.  I always like to begin with the girths spanning the horses' ribs which helped hold the saddles in place.  Even with the figures mounted individually on temporary painting bases, these can be kind of tricky to access, but there we are. I've also used various Army Painter washes (Mid-Brown and Strong Tone) as well as their Speed Paint (Grim Black) to make the manes and tails of the horses a bit m...

Basic Reds Done at Last. . .

  S till quite a way to go with the current batch of 20 human figures and a horse (of course), but they're actually starting to look like something after all of the red distinctions.  Quite a bit of painting in hour-long sessions the last week as and when time has allowed.  Mostly applying the basic dark red to facing areas and turnbacks followed by the inevitable touch-ups to clean up wobbly edges and those misplaced, minute splotches of Citadel Khorne Red.   They're looking like so many Austrian infantry regiments of the era at this point, but the eventual flags will turn them magically into the Anhalt-Zerbst Regiment, more or less, of the AWI period.  But I'm getting a bit ahead of myself. One frustrating point (ahem) of sad discovery.  I've started trying to use those Winsor & Newton 'Series Seven' brushes (#1 rounds) purchased last spring, and the blasted things simply will not keep a point.  Very frustrating since I have heard over the y...