Skip to main content

Wise Words. . .

Yes, yes.  We've seen this photograph here before, but it helps illustrate the point below very nicely I think.  Holger Eriksson dragoons, painted in the uniforms of The Imperial Gendarmes.  One of John Preece's originals is at the back, and the two replacement figures I painted are at the front.

"Admittedly, there is a need for quite a high level of detail in models intended or skirmish action where  1 model = 1 man.  But in games where one model is supposed to represent 33 men, the real aim is not to show a set of immaculate individuals, but to convey the impression of a whole seething unit.  Painting skills are well within our grasp which will allow large numbers of men to be painted [relatively] quickly to give a good impression of whole units, where far more time  and energy might be expended in making each one look brilliant, but far too strikingly individualistic.  Moulding and casting philosophies could well be linked in with this type of altered emphasis. . ." -- Paddy Griffith, "Variations on a Theme", Miniature Wargames #2.

This echoes how my own painting has evolved over the last 30+ years.  When I began back in the mid-1980s, I spent considerable time trying to add as much detail as possible to my 15mm Napoleonics.  Ah, callow youth.  It is hardly surprising that it took forever just to finish one unit of, say, 20 figures much less an entire corps like the kind I aspired to at the time.  In more recent years, and with my switch to large units of 25-30mm 18th century figures, I have gradually become more comfortable with the idea of painting neatly and to the best of my ability, but I leave certain small details to the imagination.  Not only does the bare bones approach keep me sane, but I actually have managed to paint quite a few large units of infantry, cavalry, and artillery. . .  if not in a particularly rapid way, then at least to eventual completion during the last almost ten years.  

Figures like those by RSM95, Holger Eriksson (above), Suren/Willie, and Spencer Smith lend themselves well to this more practical style of painting as do the more detailed castings by the likes of Minden, Fife&Drum, and Crann Tara, which still look good even if you chose not to paint in and highlight each gaiter button sculpted onto the castings.  My one exception to this rule concerns command and special one-off vignettes where it is fun to lavish a bit more time and attention on groups of three-five figures that will, very probably, be examined more closely than units of infantry, for example, that feature 60-80 figures wearing more or less identical uniforms and kit.

-- Stokes


Peter Douglas said…
Very wise words indeed. I like the two foot rule. My units should look good on the table from two feet away.

Nice cavalry by the way.
Cheers PD
My Dear Heinz-Ulrich,

The basic issue is simple: does what you are doing make you happy? Are you pleased with your efforts? Obviously, you have reached the very mature understanding that the part of the hobby that we are interested in is the play of the game with nicely done miniatures. There are members of the hobby who will play with anything no matter how poorly painted. Then we have others who will paint and paint and paint and never seem to get anything on the table top. Those choices are okay - but apparently not for either of us.

Thank you for the insight into where you are at with your painting and gaming.

Gerardus Magnus
Archbishop Emeritus
Der Alte Fritz said…
I would feel as if I had let the little men down if I gave them anything less than my best effort.

I know that a lot of details on the figures can't be seen at gaming level or a few feet away, but I WOULD KNOW that something was missing, so I can't do it.

Ah, but Jim, you have perfected a way to address all of the great detail in your figure painting AND still crank 'em out at an amazing pace. For those of us (raises hand) who are, shall we say, slower in wielding the brush,we must content ourselves with fairly basic rank and file. However, where my command and special vignettes are concerned, and for which I use as often as not Minden and Fife and Drum figures, I too feel a certain obligation to those small pewter men to paint as much detail as I can manage. And admittedly, a casting with all of its modeled lace, buttons, and badges properly painted is a sight to behold.

Best Regards,


Popular posts from this blog

Comfortable Rules for Games of Glossy Toy Soldiers in the Old Style. . .

  Introduction A Tangled Mass is a game of toy soldiers in the old style, set more or less in the middle part of the 18 th century.   Our miniature forces are colorful and, we hope, glossy.  Although the latter, like so much else, is up to the discretion of the players.   But it is the modeling, brushwork, and unit organization of hobby greats like Gilder, Mason, and Robinson that provide our visual touchstone and continue to inform "the look of the thing" even now. Tabletop armies in A Tangled Mass can be historic, semi-historic, or whimsically fictitious, but the more flags and mounted officers, the better.  Formations, while bearing some resemblance to their historic precedents, are generic: column, line, or extended order for lighter types.   Squares, while possible, are less common than during all of that later Napoleonic madness with its guillotines and Spanish ulcers.  And we'll simply choose not to mention patent leather dancing pumps, or that unseemly bedr

Prussian 3rd Garrison Regt. Update. . .

  Still a few small things to do, including apply fleshtone to a left hand on an officer that I somehow missed at some point plus lace on the drummers and officers , but we're very close to the glossing stage. L ots of painstaking work to clean up edges, highlight folds, and touch up various bits and pieces the last few evenings.  My trusty little Sony Cybershot, I fear, has gone to that big electronics place in the sky and no longer seems to be working.  Well, I've had it since 2013, and small electronics don't last forever, so I cannot complain.   With that little hiccup in mind, I snapped today's shot with my iPhone, brightened, and cropped it in Fotor before sharing it here.  Again, the blue is not quite so bright in reality, but the auto-improve, or whatever they call it, makes for nice bright photographs in which everything shows up.   Not long before these are done, and The Young Master was suitably please when I asked him to have a look a few minutes ago. -- Sto

A Break in the Radio Silence. . .

  S till plugging away at the 60 or so Wied Infantry currently on the painting bench as and when work and family life permit. Using three different whites for the clothing, shoulder belts, and officers' wigs plus trying some Army Painter quick washes.   My friend and one-time online magazine co-editor Greg Horne (the man behind The Duchy of Alzheim , still one of my blog and hobby touchstones) suggested I give washes a try a month or two ago, and I think he might be onto something.  Admittedly, he suggested the Citadel contrast range, but what I purchased eventually is in that general direction.  I am especially pleased with the Army Painter flesh wash, which picks out the facial details on the Minden figures very nicely.  I've applied it on top of my usual Windsor & Newton alkyd oil fleshtone and then highlighted the brows, bridges of noses, cheeks, chins, lower lips, and knuckles/thumbs the next day with more of the fleshtone.   Suddenly, and with relative ease, my paint