Skip to main content

"How do you paint your figures?"

A Continental Army staff group that I painted two or three years ago using the methods outlined below.  The 1/56 scale miniatures are from the Fife&Drum range, which is compatible with Minden, Crann Tara, and RSM95 figures and, to some extent, those by Eureka, Jackdaw, and Suren (Willie).

This week, a comment was left by a new visitor, in which he remarked about the porcelain-like appearance of my figures and asked how I get that look.  Well, it is a bit inexact, and I am always tinkering with the way I do things, but basically, it's like this.  For me, the once-upon-a-time look of the shiny Napoleonic figures in the collections of Peter Gilder and Doug Mason, that featured prominently in issues of Military Modelling and Miniature Wargames during the early 1980s, has always informed my painting.  However, it was not until a few years back that I decided to go whole hog and at least try to do something similar in my own painting.  Here's the shortened version:

I typically use a white basecoat and then apply thin washes and/or stains of the various flesh, uniform, and equipment colors over top to achieve that translucent, porcelain-like appearance.   When using acrylic model paints like those by Citadel, I simply use one of the many flow-aids available for acrylic paints in art supply or craft stores.  If using oils or alkyd oils, and I like both, I thin with either Winsor&Newton Liquin Original or Liquin Fine Detail.  The former has a consistency not unlike soft butter and is fairly easy to control while the latter is runny, so you need very little of it.  It tends to run when you use too much.  

In any case, both products speed the drying time of oils considerably.  Usually, everything is dry to the touch by the next morning.  Small details come next, for instance facing colors, crossbelts, pouches, musket stocks, and buttons are then added with acrylic hobby paintsI sometimes use oil-based silver and gold for the latter since these have more brilliance than their hobby acrylic brethren

Last of all, I apply two-three coats of glossy acrylic varnish.  For the first eight or nine years, I used the old version of Future/Klear acrylic floor wax and finally got rid of the last little bit of my single bottle as we packed up the old house to move last June.  More recently, I have relied on artists' supplies once again, using Liquitex Medium Varnish and even more recently Liquitex High Gloss Varnish.  This stuff is a bit thicker than the floor polish was, so it takes longer to apply by brush, but the results are well worth it if one is after that classic, glossy toy solider look for his or her figures. 

As I say, my approach to painting is inexact, and I always mess around with how I do things in that consistent attempt to paint the perfect figure(s).  Sort of the military figure painter's proverbial pot of gold at the end of the rainbow, or the holy grail of glossy toy soldiers.  Sometimes I almost nail that 1970s-early1980s Gilder-Mason look, and other times things fall short somewhat.  But I enjoy painting and modelling quite a bit, so each attempt is a learning experience and fun in its own right.  Especially when you finish, look the figures over, and think to yourself, "This particular batch doesn't look half bad!  Why didn't I think to do such and such like this before?"  Or, alternately, "If only I had left X alone, these would be pretty close to perfect!"

The key, I think, is not to shy away from experimenting a bit, don't get too hung up about the potential for mistakes, which are usually rectified without too much trouble, and don't overwork your paints or your figures.  Keep things fairly simple and understated, and resist the urge to apply a gazillion shades of the same color, or paint in every single minute detail.  Learn when to stop in other words.  In a nutshell, that outlines my approach to figure painting. 

-- Stokes


 A trio of Suren (Willie) 30mm women that I painted up as generic sutleresses in late 2014 using the wash and stain method described above.  The paints used were mostly oils but with small details picked out  using Citadel hobby acrylics.

Comments

joppy said…
Always interesting to hear how others do something. I must admit I never thought of using an 'industrial' varnish, as I've always used Humbrol gloss, thinking the DIY stuff probably too thick. I might experiment now.
Thank you for your comment! I think that I once read somewhere that Peter Gilder used clear boat varnish to gloss and protect his figures. An interesting idea, but the solvent fumes must have killed millions of brain cells each time though. I'll stick with acrylic based stuff or now I think.

Best Regards,

Stokes
Dr Vesuvius said…
It is a truly lovely and distinctive style. They really do look like porcelain figurines. Perfect for 18th century figures. Bravo!
Stryker said…
I love the finish you achieve - certainly right up there with Gilder!

Popular posts from this blog

Presenting the Anspach-Bayreuth Kuirassiere!!!

Here they are, with the rearmost nine figures still drying, three squadrons of the Anspach-Bayreuth Kuirassiere, now in the service of the Grand Duchy of Stollen. And now, it's onto that artillery!

And It's the End of September!!!

  Saxony's Ploetz Cuirassiers, an illustration lifted from the Kronoskaf website, which has thus far guided my spectacularly glacial painting of 30 28mm Eureka Saxon cuirassiers purchased all the way back in October 2016. A gray, cool Saturday here in Mid-Michigan with rain in the forecast. The Grand Duchess is away at a conference, so it's just "The Boys" here at home. The Young Master (almost 15) has retreated to his room for something or other following breakfast while I have stolen back down here to Zum Stollenkeller (masquerading as my office) with a second mug of coffee and both cats comfortably ensconced nearby. Enjoying the late morning and still in my pajamas! Not much planned for today beyond designing a couple of promotional flyers for workshops my department is presenting (small parties we will throw?) in October and November.  With maybe a bit of on the next podcast script. More important,  I am toying with the idea of returning for an hour or...

Happy September 2nd!!!

    T his weekend, the question of what, precisely, constitutes an "imagination" came up in an online forum of which I am a part.  To be fair, the issue originates from further afield in a Facebook group that I am not a member of, but I weighed in with my own view.  The following was in response to the question posed yesterday (Sunday) morning by an exasperated member of my own rather more gentlemanly town square, who had been met with a strident response to information he shared about his (admirable) hobby activities on said FB group.  Here is, more or less, what I wrote: To my mind, the concept of imagi-nation(s) is a broad one.  It can range from historical refights or what-if scenarios/battles/campaigns between armies of a particular era, to completely made up combatants operating in a quasi-historical setting, to the rather generic red and blue forces of the Prussian Kriegspiel that examine a particular tactical problem, task, or exercise.   ...