Skip to main content

Grammar Addendum

Well, this is embarrassing. A little bird has told me quietly that I’ve made some recent errors regarding use of the words “past” (indicating former time) and “passed” (past tense of the verb “to pass”) in more than a couple of posts here. <Insert choice language here>!

So, time to own up. We are nothing in the Grand Duchy of Stollen if not brutally honest and forthcoming about our faults. Let me assure those of you Stollen regulars who notice such things that I do know the difference between these two words. Even worse, this is a point I hammer into my writing students during the school year!


I figure that one of three things has happened in each case. Either I have been too hasty in typing my posts and have typed one when I meant the other, or I’ve depended too heavily on spell-check, which will sometimes change a misspelled word to another one that’s close to it, not necessarily the one you intended. Or, three, I need to beef up my editing skills before “pasting” (not “passeding”) an entry into the blog. Grumble, grumble, grumble. . .


We now return you to your regularly scheduled program

Comments

David Morfitt said…
Hi Stokes,

I confess I had noticed that but didn't want to say anything - indeed, I wasn't sure if it was just yet another oddity of American English (compared with English English, that is). :-)

It's the sort of thing that easily happens when dashing off another blog post, though, so hopefully you don't feel too despondent about it.

All the best,

David.
Fitz-Badger said…
Yeah, I noticed, too, but we all make mistakes like that even when we know better. To err is human... :-)

(drives me crazy when people write "could of" when they mean "could've" or "I could care less" (I think it should be "I couldn't care less") or mix up words like "your" and "you're" or "there" and "their" - but I know as soon as I start trying to correct them I'll commit a typo or error in grammar or something! Probably did one here somewhere! lol)
CWT said…
I hadn't noticed, if that makes you feel better.

Just claim it's some 'authentic' period grammar, from the years before Dr Johnson wrote the dictionary. That way, how can you possibly be wrong?
Martin said…
Hello Stokes,

Editing youself are hard! (Ha, ha.) Of course we all want to communicate clearly and put our best foot forward, but on the other hand, as long as your intent was clear, this is a pretty forgiving bunch. So lighten up on yourself Professor.

Yours,

Martin

Popular posts from this blog

Presenting the Anspach-Bayreuth Kuirassiere!!!

Here they are, with the rearmost nine figures still drying, three squadrons of the Anspach-Bayreuth Kuirassiere, now in the service of the Grand Duchy of Stollen. And now, it's onto that artillery!

And It's the End of September!!!

  Saxony's Ploetz Cuirassiers, an illustration lifted from the Kronoskaf website, which has thus far guided my spectacularly glacial painting of 30 28mm Eureka Saxon cuirassiers purchased all the way back in October 2016. A gray, cool Saturday here in Mid-Michigan with rain in the forecast. The Grand Duchess is away at a conference, so it's just "The Boys" here at home. The Young Master (almost 15) has retreated to his room for something or other following breakfast while I have stolen back down here to Zum Stollenkeller (masquerading as my office) with a second mug of coffee and both cats comfortably ensconced nearby. Enjoying the late morning and still in my pajamas! Not much planned for today beyond designing a couple of promotional flyers for workshops my department is presenting (small parties we will throw?) in October and November.  With maybe a bit of on the next podcast script. More important,  I am toying with the idea of returning for an hour or...

Happy September 2nd!!!

    T his weekend, the question of what, precisely, constitutes an "imagination" came up in an online forum of which I am a part.  To be fair, the issue originates from further afield in a Facebook group that I am not a member of, but I weighed in with my own view.  The following was in response to the question posed yesterday (Sunday) morning by an exasperated member of my own rather more gentlemanly town square, who had been met with a strident response to information he shared about his (admirable) hobby activities on said FB group.  Here is, more or less, what I wrote: To my mind, the concept of imagi-nation(s) is a broad one.  It can range from historical refights or what-if scenarios/battles/campaigns between armies of a particular era, to completely made up combatants operating in a quasi-historical setting, to the rather generic red and blue forces of the Prussian Kriegspiel that examine a particular tactical problem, task, or exercise.   ...