Skip to main content

Look! Up in the sky! It's a bird, it's a plane, no it's. . . Charles Grant?

Very interesting recent discussion over at the Old School Wargaming Yahoo Group about the use of artillery limbers on the table. No doubt about it, I'll eventually have to purchase and paint gun teams and limbers to use with my 1/72 Revell Austrian crews and 25mm MiniFig cannon! That should make for interesting tactical problems to work out and will add spice to any Grantian Tabletop Teaser scenario rather nicely.

Last night, I began preparing the first six of 30 figures (in the classic "charge" pose) for eventual base coating. They are lovely miniatures, but they do need some work with a sharp x-acto/scalpel to remove the heavy mold lines. I suspect this comes from aging molds.

Anyway, since the figures seem to be very soft lead (Shock! Horror! Gasp!), this particular operation goes fairly quickly. Afterwards, the figures look graceful and majestic, even in their unpainted state. The Spencer Smiths do fall over rather easily, so gluing some kind of bases to them is a given. But I will keep them (un-)based singly, just like the rest of my figures.

For those of you who might like to add some Spencer Smith cavalry to your 18th century forces, by all means do so. Don't let the lack of detail put you off. Careful painting should result in very attractive finished figures.

One caveat -- The range lacks guidon bearers and trumpeters. However, this is remedied easily by including the requisite (though somewhat costlier) Holger Eriksson figures in your regimental order of battle. Accordingly, I've added a swallow-tailed guidon bearing figure and a bugler.

The HE figures are a bit more finely sculpted with very little in the way of flash or mold lines. Best of all, they fit in well with the SSM's. Once painted, it should be very hard to discern any difference between the two ranges. Stay tuned right here for future developments!

Comments

abdul666 said…
So we stay, be sure, so we stay!
Jean-Louis
Bluebear Jeff said…
Hi,

Which "table top teaser" are you planning?


-- Jeff
Thanks Jean-Louis!

Jeff,

Well, all of them! Kidding aside, I'll probably start with a scenario that involves a bridge and/or river crossing since the armies of Stollen and Zichenau have been observing each other across the Lesser Zwischen River for several months now. I might also use something from either of Charles Stewart Grant's books on wargame scenarios.

Best Regards,

Stokes
...can I suggest a few items for your consideration?? "http://www.geocities.com/steveh_wargamer/Teasers/Teaser-Feb78.doc" is Teaser #1 from the old Battle magazine in '78 (Bridge Demolition) alternatively, Teaser #12 looks good ("http://www.geocities.com/steveh_wargamer/Teasers/Teaser-April80.doc")...further suggestions to be had on the Teasers project (linked from my Blog).. Steve
marinergrim said…
I've always liked the HE figures and it's one of the things to do next year for the Big Battalion game being planned.

Popular posts from this blog

And We're Off!!!

  Arrrgh!  Gotta go back into camera settings on my iPhone to bring all of the frame into focus.  Blast! Painting is underway on the 60 or so Minden Austrians, which are slated to become my version of the Anhalt-Zerbst Regiment of AWI renown.  More or less indistinguishable from Austrians of the era really, right down to the red facings and turnbacks, but the eventual flags (already in my files) will set them apart.   I went ahead and based-coated all of them over a couple of days lthe last week of August, using a mix of light gray and white acrylic gesso, before next applying my usual basic alkyd oil flesh tone to the faces and hands.  In a day or two, I'll hit that with Army Painter Flesh Wash to tone things down a bit and bring some definition to the faces and hands.   As usual, the plan is to focus on about 20 figures at a time, splitting the regiment roughly into thirds along with the color party and regimental staff.  Depending on ...

Sunday Morning Coffee with AI. . .

    A rmed with a second cup of fresh, strong coffee, I messed around a bit this morning with artlist.io using its image to image function in an attempt to convert my hand-drawn map from September 2006 to something that more resembles an old map from the mid-18th century.  And just like my experiments with Ninja AI in June, the results are mixed.   The above map is pretty good, but Artlist keeps fouling up the place names and has trouble putting a faint overlay of hexes across the entire area.  Hexes, admittedly, are not likely to be found on any genuine maps from the era in question, but there we are.  Frankly, I prefer the appearance of the Ninja map, but there were problems getting it to correct its errors.  Grrrr.  As is the case with so much having to do with the various AI's out there now, the output generated is a direct result of the prompts entered.  For text alone, and when you develop a lengthy, highly detailed prompt, it is...

Continued Regional Map Revisions. . .

F ooled around a bit more with the revised map just before and after dinner this evening, using the Fotor app to reinsert missing text .  I also removed a few other things using the 'Magic Eraser' function, which works surprisingly well.  Now, we're getting somewhere.  I just have to figure out how to ensure that the text is all a uniform font style and maybe figure out a way to add a few bunches of trees to suggest forested areas,  Ninja AI is not always entirely cooperative to the tune of "I'm sorry Dave.  I can't do that." -- Stokes