Skip to main content

Mulling Things Over Instead. . .

A rousing illustration of Prussian infantry charging toward the enemy lines.


Chilly, wet, and foggy here today in Mid-Michigan.  Much like the weather in Southampton, England many years ago (1988-1989) when I visited newly married ol' Mom and Stepdad for the Christmas and New Year's period.  I've delayed the planned game until New Year's Eve in favor of more painting (harnesses, reins, and bridles are now painted and highlighted) and a nice long walk with The Grand Duchess and Young Master earlier this afternoon.

But one can always mull over possible rules, right?  So, let me bounce this latest idea off of you.  Does it seem reasonable to give the option of firing first before then charging toward the enemy to line infantry units for which a charge has been declared at the start of a turn?  As always, I'm interested in your thoughts on the matter.

 -- Stokes


Hanover infantry this time, making, if not an out and out charge, then at least a menacing move toward the enemy.

Comments

Norm said…
I’m not sure where I have read it, but I thought I saw some text that suggested commanders
who wanted to charge, did not want troops to ‘stand and fire’, because it was then difficult to
get them out of that mindset and into a charging mindset.
12:46 AM
nobby said…
"Does it seem reasonable to give the option of firing first before then charging toward the enemy to line infantry units for which a charge has been declared at the start of a turn?"

Does it seem unreasonable? I'd have thought not and if the effect of firing is counted before charging you could be charging onto a weakened enemy.

What do I know? I am completely new to this period :0)
2:34 AM
Martin said…
Happy New Year, Stokes! Firing off a volley then closing with the cold steel was a standard tactic of the times. So... yes on having that as an option. I leave the Colonel's decision to do so... or not; up to the dice. Throw a 1, 2, or 3, and yes; the regiment erupts in a cloud of smoke, flames, and lead... then advances towards the foe. Throw a 4, 5, or a 6, and no; the regiment holds its fire as it advances. All in all, this has worked out pretty well over the years. Sometimes they do; and sometimes they don't... and always, an imaginative wargamer can come up with a reasonable justification as to why. I'm looking forward to reading the after action report of the encounter at Hook's Farm!
7:40 AM
warpaintjj said…
It may well be possible in theory for highly drilled & motivated troops but we're talking rules mechanics in a game. Allowing this takes out some of the decision making we all love, call command & control if you like. You could allow it for Guard regiments who are fresh I guess, but I suspect you would lose something in the game if everyone can have their cake & eat it.
Wishing you a very Happy New Year & a fabulous decade,
Jeremy
6:51 PM
Independentwargamesgroup said…
Good question Stokes and it depends whether you want a simpler and fast moving game or a more sedate and deliberate game with additional complexity.I opt for moving THEN firing rules, but thats because it is easier to play. Usually I will use Blackpowder which uses this set up, but I know that certain BlackPowder players have introduced firing first followed by movement. From what I understand of the period once the line was firing it was very hard to get the troops to move forward. Suvarov wouldnt allow his men to have loaded muskets in order that they kept moving and use their bayonets, but that is an extreme example.Personally if you want your units to fire then charge I would create a dice throw penalising units that had fired before wanting to charge.
9:32 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Presenting the Anspach-Bayreuth Kuirassiere!!!

Here they are, with the rearmost nine figures still drying, three squadrons of the Anspach-Bayreuth Kuirassiere, now in the service of the Grand Duchy of Stollen. And now, it's onto that artillery!
14 comments
Read more

And It's the End of September!!!

  Saxony's Ploetz Cuirassiers, an illustration lifted from the Kronoskaf website, which has thus far guided my spectacularly glacial painting of 30 28mm Eureka Saxon cuirassiers purchased all the way back in October 2016. A gray, cool Saturday here in Mid-Michigan with rain in the forecast. The Grand Duchess is away at a conference, so it's just "The Boys" here at home. The Young Master (almost 15) has retreated to his room for something or other following breakfast while I have stolen back down here to Zum Stollenkeller (masquerading as my office) with a second mug of coffee and both cats comfortably ensconced nearby. Enjoying the late morning and still in my pajamas! Not much planned for today beyond designing a couple of promotional flyers for workshops my department is presenting (small parties we will throw?) in October and November.  With maybe a bit of on the next podcast script. More important,  I am toying with the idea of returning for an hour or...
4 comments
Read more

Happy September 2nd!!!

    T his weekend, the question of what, precisely, constitutes an "imagination" came up in an online forum of which I am a part.  To be fair, the issue originates from further afield in a Facebook group that I am not a member of, but I weighed in with my own view.  The following was in response to the question posed yesterday (Sunday) morning by an exasperated member of my own rather more gentlemanly town square, who had been met with a strident response to information he shared about his (admirable) hobby activities on said FB group.  Here is, more or less, what I wrote: To my mind, the concept of imagi-nation(s) is a broad one.  It can range from historical refights or what-if scenarios/battles/campaigns between armies of a particular era, to completely made up combatants operating in a quasi-historical setting, to the rather generic red and blue forces of the Prussian Kriegspiel that examine a particular tactical problem, task, or exercise.   ...
6 comments
Read more