Skip to main content

Happy September 2nd!!!

 

 

This weekend, the question of what, precisely, constitutes an "imagination" came up in an online forum of which I am a part.  To be fair, the issue originates from further afield in a Facebook group that I am not a member of, but I weighed in with my own view.  The following was in response to the question posed yesterday (Sunday) morning by an exasperated member of my own rather more gentlemanly town square, who had been met with a strident response to information he shared about his (admirable) hobby activities on said FB group.  Here is, more or less, what I wrote:


To my mind, the concept of imagi-nation(s) is a broad one.  It can range from historical refights or what-if scenarios/battles/campaigns between armies of a particular era, to completely made up combatants operating in a quasi-historical setting, to the rather generic red and blue forces of the Prussian Kriegspiel that examine a particular tactical problem, task, or exercise.   And then there are near endless variations thereof.  Think too of Charles S. Grant's various Tabletop Teasers, Stuart Asquith's refights of famous tabletop encounters, the exploits of The Wargamers back in 2005-2007 (as detailed in the much missed Battle Games), and many others.  

Whew! That was a mouthful. 
 
And that ignores our fantasy-scifi cousins who deploy armies of Skaven (sp?), Orcs, space marines, or what have you.  Certainly imagi-nation in spirit there.
 
We might make the argument that ALL wargaming, even so called historically-based games, to one degree or another is imagination. Even if we do not don silly hats made of folded newspaper, who among us does not hear distant trumpets, drums, and the thunder of cavalry formations passing by as we set up and maneuver our legions and brigades of plastic and tin men across the table? And all without the fear of sudden death, or other horrors of the real thing.


For the record, I've always preferred the term "fictitious armies." But I'm an outlier.  And who would have suspected such opinionated verbosity after just one mug of coffee on a Sunday morning? 

 

-- Stokes

 

Comments

Donnie McGibbon said…
I thought your reply on the forum was spot on Stokes, hit the nail on the head and one I agree with totally. Our hobby is an extremely broad church and people trying to inflict "their way is the true way" ideas on everyone else is a large bugbear of mine.
Rob said…
Ah, Autumn, the season of mellow mists and fruitless semantic arguments. ;o)
Indeed! Thank you for your comments, gentlemen.

Kind Regards,

Stokes
caveadsum1471 said…
The broad church is surely the best, avoiding the true believers and their exclusivity! I liked your bridge post, it reminded me that I fancied building a late medieval bridge with buildings, like the ponte vechio or the old London bridge, what fun!
Best Iain
Pjotr said…
Dear Stokes, after another long absence due to life, the universe and everything, I'm back and catching up. I wholeheartedly agree with you're point of view and I'always like to say that we're just playing with toy soldiers, to sum it up.
Best Wishes
Peter
Jiminho said…
Hi Stokes, Just dropping by to catch up. I liked your Imagination/fictional armies reflection, I am inclined to agree with you. For me, the imaginary part is sometimes more, sometimes less important. Whatever gets the brain and creativity engaged. Nevertheless I'm more inclined to like a touch of RPG than positivist Kreigspiel Red vs Blue however. Jim

Popular posts from this blog

The 18th century? What's the Fascination?

Hessian musketeers by All the King's Men Toy Soldiers of Snellville, Georgia, U.S.A. Just a quick post post today, but I thought the above question might be interesting food for thought. Obviously, there is an array of possible periods, theaters, and conflicts that might catch our eyes. But what is it about the era 1700-1799 -- either real, or imagined? Is it the commanders and politics? The fairly straightforward tactics? The myriad of uniforms and flags? The variety and scope of the conflicts? The patchwork of various and sundry petty states, (at least in Central Europe)? I'm very interested to learn your thoughts. Don't be a lurker! Please leave a comment -- or even two or three. Have a nice day everyone!

An Early July Hussar Update. . .

  Marginally neater in appearance with green bases, girths, and ivory horse markings added, but I need to neaten up some hooves now before moving onto the rest of the tack. W here in the world did June go? While I still ponder the answer to that question, how about a quick painting update on the first batch of 14 Minden Austrian hussars and Nadasdy? Good.  I'm glad we are of a like mind. Still on the sloppy side, but I've managed to move things along, painting the green bases, white (ivory) horse markings, and beginning the miles and miles of tack adorning the various horses.  I always like to begin with the girths spanning the horses' ribs which helped hold the saddles in place.  Even with the figures mounted individually on temporary painting bases, these can be kind of tricky to access, but there we are. I've also used various Army Painter washes (Mid-Brown and Strong Tone) as well as their Speed Paint (Grim Black) to make the manes and tails of the horses a bit m...

Basic Reds Done at Last. . .

  S till quite a way to go with the current batch of 20 human figures and a horse (of course), but they're actually starting to look like something after all of the red distinctions.  Quite a bit of painting in hour-long sessions the last week as and when time has allowed.  Mostly applying the basic dark red to facing areas and turnbacks followed by the inevitable touch-ups to clean up wobbly edges and those misplaced, minute splotches of Citadel Khorne Red.   They're looking like so many Austrian infantry regiments of the era at this point, but the eventual flags will turn them magically into the Anhalt-Zerbst Regiment, more or less, of the AWI period.  But I'm getting a bit ahead of myself. One frustrating point (ahem) of sad discovery.  I've started trying to use those Winsor & Newton 'Series Seven' brushes (#1 rounds) purchased last spring, and the blasted things simply will not keep a point.  Very frustrating since I have heard over the y...