Skip to main content

"How do you paint your figures?"

A Continental Army staff group that I painted two or three years ago using the methods outlined below.  The 1/56 scale miniatures are from the Fife&Drum range, which is compatible with Minden, Crann Tara, and RSM95 figures and, to some extent, those by Eureka, Jackdaw, and Suren (Willie).

This week, a comment was left by a new visitor, in which he remarked about the porcelain-like appearance of my figures and asked how I get that look.  Well, it is a bit inexact, and I am always tinkering with the way I do things, but basically, it's like this.  For me, the once-upon-a-time look of the shiny Napoleonic figures in the collections of Peter Gilder and Doug Mason, that featured prominently in issues of Military Modelling and Miniature Wargames during the early 1980s, has always informed my painting.  However, it was not until a few years back that I decided to go whole hog and at least try to do something similar in my own painting.  Here's the shortened version:

I typically use a white basecoat and then apply thin washes and/or stains of the various flesh, uniform, and equipment colors over top to achieve that translucent, porcelain-like appearance.   When using acrylic model paints like those by Citadel, I simply use one of the many flow-aids available for acrylic paints in art supply or craft stores.  If using oils or alkyd oils, and I like both, I thin with either Winsor&Newton Liquin Original or Liquin Fine Detail.  The former has a consistency not unlike soft butter and is fairly easy to control while the latter is runny, so you need very little of it.  It tends to run when you use too much.  

In any case, both products speed the drying time of oils considerably.  Usually, everything is dry to the touch by the next morning.  Small details come next, for instance facing colors, crossbelts, pouches, musket stocks, and buttons are then added with acrylic hobby paintsI sometimes use oil-based silver and gold for the latter since these have more brilliance than their hobby acrylic brethren

Last of all, I apply two-three coats of glossy acrylic varnish.  For the first eight or nine years, I used the old version of Future/Klear acrylic floor wax and finally got rid of the last little bit of my single bottle as we packed up the old house to move last June.  More recently, I have relied on artists' supplies once again, using Liquitex Medium Varnish and even more recently Liquitex High Gloss Varnish.  This stuff is a bit thicker than the floor polish was, so it takes longer to apply by brush, but the results are well worth it if one is after that classic, glossy toy solider look for his or her figures. 

As I say, my approach to painting is inexact, and I always mess around with how I do things in that consistent attempt to paint the perfect figure(s).  Sort of the military figure painter's proverbial pot of gold at the end of the rainbow, or the holy grail of glossy toy soldiers.  Sometimes I almost nail that 1970s-early1980s Gilder-Mason look, and other times things fall short somewhat.  But I enjoy painting and modelling quite a bit, so each attempt is a learning experience and fun in its own right.  Especially when you finish, look the figures over, and think to yourself, "This particular batch doesn't look half bad!  Why didn't I think to do such and such like this before?"  Or, alternately, "If only I had left X alone, these would be pretty close to perfect!"

The key, I think, is not to shy away from experimenting a bit, don't get too hung up about the potential for mistakes, which are usually rectified without too much trouble, and don't overwork your paints or your figures.  Keep things fairly simple and understated, and resist the urge to apply a gazillion shades of the same color, or paint in every single minute detail.  Learn when to stop in other words.  In a nutshell, that outlines my approach to figure painting. 

-- Stokes


 A trio of Suren (Willie) 30mm women that I painted up as generic sutleresses in late 2014 using the wash and stain method described above.  The paints used were mostly oils but with small details picked out  using Citadel hobby acrylics.

Comments

joppy said…
Always interesting to hear how others do something. I must admit I never thought of using an 'industrial' varnish, as I've always used Humbrol gloss, thinking the DIY stuff probably too thick. I might experiment now.
Thank you for your comment! I think that I once read somewhere that Peter Gilder used clear boat varnish to gloss and protect his figures. An interesting idea, but the solvent fumes must have killed millions of brain cells each time though. I'll stick with acrylic based stuff or now I think.

Best Regards,

Stokes
Dr Vesuvius said…
It is a truly lovely and distinctive style. They really do look like porcelain figurines. Perfect for 18th century figures. Bravo!
Stryker said…
I love the finish you achieve - certainly right up there with Gilder!

Popular posts from this blog

And We're Off!!!

  Arrrgh!  Gotta go back into camera settings on my iPhone to bring all of the frame into focus.  Blast! Painting is underway on the 60 or so Minden Austrians, which are slated to become my version of the Anhalt-Zerbst Regiment of AWI renown.  More or less indistinguishable from Austrians of the era really, right down to the red facings and turnbacks, but the eventual flags (already in my files) will set them apart.   I went ahead and based-coated all of them over a couple of days lthe last week of August, using a mix of light gray and white acrylic gesso, before next applying my usual basic alkyd oil flesh tone to the faces and hands.  In a day or two, I'll hit that with Army Painter Flesh Wash to tone things down a bit and bring some definition to the faces and hands.   As usual, the plan is to focus on about 20 figures at a time, splitting the regiment roughly into thirds along with the color party and regimental staff.  Depending on ...

Sunday Morning Coffee with AI. . .

    A rmed with a second cup of fresh, strong coffee, I messed around a bit this morning with artlist.io using its image to image function in an attempt to convert my hand-drawn map from September 2006 to something that more resembles an old map from the mid-18th century.  And just like my experiments with Ninja AI in June, the results are mixed.   The above map is pretty good, but Artlist keeps fouling up the place names and has trouble putting a faint overlay of hexes across the entire area.  Hexes, admittedly, are not likely to be found on any genuine maps from the era in question, but there we are.  Frankly, I prefer the appearance of the Ninja map, but there were problems getting it to correct its errors.  Grrrr.  As is the case with so much having to do with the various AI's out there now, the output generated is a direct result of the prompts entered.  For text alone, and when you develop a lengthy, highly detailed prompt, it is...

Continued Regional Map Revisions. . .

F ooled around a bit more with the revised map just before and after dinner this evening, using the Fotor app to reinsert missing text .  I also removed a few other things using the 'Magic Eraser' function, which works surprisingly well.  Now, we're getting somewhere.  I just have to figure out how to ensure that the text is all a uniform font style and maybe figure out a way to add a few bunches of trees to suggest forested areas,  Ninja AI is not always entirely cooperative to the tune of "I'm sorry Dave.  I can't do that." -- Stokes