Skip to main content

A Case of the Butterflies. . .

Beautiful to look at , but very, very dangerous from a wargaming perspective.

In light of a recent conversation I had with a wargaming friend while in Berlin, I find myself lately pondering how I might use those unused Waterloo-era Napoleonics.  These, some of you might recall, have been in careful storage since the early 2000s when I made the radical switch from 15mm to 30mm, and the Grand Duchy of Stollen project with its imaginary mid-18th century focus began.  

In theory, it all seems so simple.  So plausible.  So reasonable.  So do-able.  

Here's my thinking on all of this.  Think more like a general instead of a company officer.  Make the game a more abstract exercise.  Use the hundreds of figures I have painted already, transfer them to small, square basswood bases, and paint up the few remaining that I might still need.  The figures become purely symbolic, a dozen or so (for infantry) representing various divisions and, in a few cases, brigades.  Each base can then be modeled as some kind of interesting mini-diorama or vignette rather than trying to represent actual late Napoleonic tactical formations like lines, columns, or squares.  Easy, right?

And yet, I know from experience that the Napoleonic road leads to an inescapable mire.  Figurative Belgian mud.  Hobby quicksand.  Or, to put it another way, trying to reduce the entire Waterloo campaign to an attainable corps-level collection and playable game seems like a temporal sinkhole that leads nowhere.  Except to madness.  And still these thrilling, Peter Gilder-inspired thoughts plague me during the hours of consciousness.  The Waterloo campaign was my first wargaming love after all.

Perhaps, it is a very good thing that all of my stuff remains in storage, and current living space very limited, given our temporary housing situation. Sigh.  Far better to steer the course and continue with my tri-cornered hats and mitre caps in their semi-fictitious context once we are again in a house equipped with a Zum Stollenkeller Mk II.

-- Stokes

Comments

Why?? Who says you have to say wedded to one period?? Use the Napleonics you have - no need to paint more if you don't want to? :o)
Unknown said…
I have to be strong too; so I avoid my unpainted 28mm Napoleonics and focus on my SYW stuff. Hang in there, you're not alone!!

Simon
MSFoy said…
Stokes - if you REALLY want to unsettle yourself at this stage, get your hands on a copy of Sam Mustafa's "Blücher", and have a quick read, keeping your 15mm chaps and your current thoughts in mind. Then see if your palms are getting sweaty...

Cheers - Tony
Whiskers said…
As a total aside, I immediately saw your butterflies as a source for imagi-nation flags.
My wargaming butterly mind is working overtime.
Prince Lupus said…
I'm a big fan of Volley and Bayonet, sounds like that would scratch the itch.
marinergrim said…
There was an article a few years back in one of the magazines where a gamer had taken the units at waterloo and recreated them in 15mm on wooden blocks to represent the unit rather than paint all the figures we would normally expect.
Old School said…
Will it ever be possible for us to comment again on your excellent posts on your "Classic Style..." blog?
Bloggerator said…
Stokes,

Get over to ross's blog and stert thinking about gridded wargames. This seems to be where your thoughts seem to be trending.

A boxed Waterloo? Who knew?

Greg
I might be a robot. You never know.

Popular posts from this blog

Presenting the Anspach-Bayreuth Kuirassiere!!!

Here they are, with the rearmost nine figures still drying, three squadrons of the Anspach-Bayreuth Kuirassiere, now in the service of the Grand Duchy of Stollen. And now, it's onto that artillery!

And It's the End of September!!!

  Saxony's Ploetz Cuirassiers, an illustration lifted from the Kronoskaf website, which has thus far guided my spectacularly glacial painting of 30 28mm Eureka Saxon cuirassiers purchased all the way back in October 2016. A gray, cool Saturday here in Mid-Michigan with rain in the forecast. The Grand Duchess is away at a conference, so it's just "The Boys" here at home. The Young Master (almost 15) has retreated to his room for something or other following breakfast while I have stolen back down here to Zum Stollenkeller (masquerading as my office) with a second mug of coffee and both cats comfortably ensconced nearby. Enjoying the late morning and still in my pajamas! Not much planned for today beyond designing a couple of promotional flyers for workshops my department is presenting (small parties we will throw?) in October and November.  With maybe a bit of on the next podcast script. More important,  I am toying with the idea of returning for an hour or...

Happy September 2nd!!!

    T his weekend, the question of what, precisely, constitutes an "imagination" came up in an online forum of which I am a part.  To be fair, the issue originates from further afield in a Facebook group that I am not a member of, but I weighed in with my own view.  The following was in response to the question posed yesterday (Sunday) morning by an exasperated member of my own rather more gentlemanly town square, who had been met with a strident response to information he shared about his (admirable) hobby activities on said FB group.  Here is, more or less, what I wrote: To my mind, the concept of imagi-nation(s) is a broad one.  It can range from historical refights or what-if scenarios/battles/campaigns between armies of a particular era, to completely made up combatants operating in a quasi-historical setting, to the rather generic red and blue forces of the Prussian Kriegspiel that examine a particular tactical problem, task, or exercise.   ...