Skip to main content

Grammar Addendum

Well, this is embarrassing. A little bird has told me quietly that I’ve made some recent errors regarding use of the words “past” (indicating former time) and “passed” (past tense of the verb “to pass”) in more than a couple of posts here. <Insert choice language here>!

So, time to own up. We are nothing in the Grand Duchy of Stollen if not brutally honest and forthcoming about our faults. Let me assure those of you Stollen regulars who notice such things that I do know the difference between these two words. Even worse, this is a point I hammer into my writing students during the school year!


I figure that one of three things has happened in each case. Either I have been too hasty in typing my posts and have typed one when I meant the other, or I’ve depended too heavily on spell-check, which will sometimes change a misspelled word to another one that’s close to it, not necessarily the one you intended. Or, three, I need to beef up my editing skills before “pasting” (not “passeding”) an entry into the blog. Grumble, grumble, grumble. . .


We now return you to your regularly scheduled program

Comments

David Morfitt said…
Hi Stokes,

I confess I had noticed that but didn't want to say anything - indeed, I wasn't sure if it was just yet another oddity of American English (compared with English English, that is). :-)

It's the sort of thing that easily happens when dashing off another blog post, though, so hopefully you don't feel too despondent about it.

All the best,

David.
Fitz-Badger said…
Yeah, I noticed, too, but we all make mistakes like that even when we know better. To err is human... :-)

(drives me crazy when people write "could of" when they mean "could've" or "I could care less" (I think it should be "I couldn't care less") or mix up words like "your" and "you're" or "there" and "their" - but I know as soon as I start trying to correct them I'll commit a typo or error in grammar or something! Probably did one here somewhere! lol)
CWT said…
I hadn't noticed, if that makes you feel better.

Just claim it's some 'authentic' period grammar, from the years before Dr Johnson wrote the dictionary. That way, how can you possibly be wrong?
Martin said…
Hello Stokes,

Editing youself are hard! (Ha, ha.) Of course we all want to communicate clearly and put our best foot forward, but on the other hand, as long as your intent was clear, this is a pretty forgiving bunch. So lighten up on yourself Professor.

Yours,

Martin

Popular posts from this blog

A Little More Brushwork. . .

    A little more brushwork on the first batch of (my version of) the Anhalt-Zerbst Regiment yesterday (Saturday).  Taking a different tack this time and addressing many of the details first before the white coats and other larger areas of uniform.   The eagle-eyed among you will notice that I've painted the (dark) red stocks of the enlisted men.  Always a difficult and frustrating item to paint, it made sense to paint from the inside out as it were and get that particular detail out of the way first rather than try to paint it in later after much other painting has been accomplished.  Trying to reduce the need for later retouching of other items on the figures you understand. Hopefully, I will be able to get back to these later today after a second trip back to the Apple Store for help with a couple of new iPad issues and, following the return home, some revision of Google Slides for tomorrow's meetings with my students. -- Stokes P.S. And according t...

Basic Reds Done at Last. . .

  S till quite a way to go with the current batch of 20 human figures and a horse (of course), but they're actually starting to look like something after all of the red distinctions.  Quite a bit of painting in hour-long sessions the last week as and when time has allowed.  Mostly applying the basic dark red to facing areas and turnbacks followed by the inevitable touch-ups to clean up wobbly edges and those misplaced, minute splotches of Citadel Khorne Red.   They're looking like so many Austrian infantry regiments of the era at this point, but the eventual flags will turn them magically into the Anhalt-Zerbst Regiment, more or less, of the AWI period.  But I'm getting a bit ahead of myself. One frustrating point (ahem) of sad discovery.  I've started trying to use those Winsor & Newton 'Series Seven' brushes (#1 rounds) purchased last spring, and the blasted things simply will not keep a point.  Very frustrating since I have heard over the y...

It's Early Days Yet. . .

M aking some early progress with Batch A of the Anhalt-Zerbst Regiment over the last several days/evenings.  Nothing terribly exciting just yet, but the basic black, brown, and flesh areas are done as are the green bases, and gray undercoat.   The latter two areas needed some careful retouching early in the week.  Next up, the neck stocks.   I might just do these in red for the enlisted men although some of my source material suggest they were black, but I always look for an excuse to shake things up a bit.  Any errant splotches of red (or black) can be covered with another application of light gray before I move onto the next step.   "Giddy up!" as one Cosmo Kramer might have said. -- Stokes